Subscribe for the latest Brand Protection info in your inbox

Your email:

cta_image180

Listen to the BrandProtect Blog

reputation_cta

Follow Us!

blog.brandprotect.com

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Who is responsible for protecting a company's online reputation?

  
  
  
  
I was having dinner the other night with a close friend and we were discussing all of the exciting things that were going on at BrandProtect. He was really intrigued, recognizing the threat of internet crime and the potential abuse of social media discussions where exploding and a major reason for concern to corporations whose brand and reputation was of significant value.

He said, "I love the business, and can see the growth potential. Who do you sell it to?"

"Well", I said, "that's always a challenge in newly born industry. Usually it's either someone from the legal department, or the chief risk officer of a financial institution or someone from marketing, IR, PR,  IT, or HR. Sometimes it's the CFO or the CEO but that's usually in response to a crisis. Bottom line, most companies are not exactly sure who is responsible for protecting the company's reputation. At the end of the day the responsibility falls to the CEO.

To which my friend wisely said "Well yes the responsibility is always the CEO's; but for major assets of a corporation or drivers to profit they have key players in place. The CFO looks after the finances; the head of marketing looks after the company's marketing strategy, similarly, with Sales, Operations R&D and so on. All are ultimately the CEO's responsibility, but there is key management in place to oversee and manage the asset. Since most companies would agree that their most important asset is their brand shouldn't there be someone completely responsible for overseeing and protecting the company's reputation?"

We both concluded that there is a need in corporate America for a new position. Chief Reputation Officer or Chief Brand Officer may be just a title and in fact it can be an additional responsibility to one of the more well defined and accepted disciplines (legal, marketing IR etc.) but bottom line, someone has to have the role and the authority to form cross functional teams to manage issues both proactively and have a plan in place to deal with any kind of crisis"

The ability to eliminate threats to a company's reputation immediately is critical. Allowing unmanaged issues to "tip" is disastrous to a company's reputation, future, valuation and to an executive's longevity.

Just look at the recent social media disasters to Domino's Pizza, Stella Beer, United Airlines etc.

Would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions on this subject.

Comments

Part of the challenge is that many organizations are under the mistaken belief that "brand" means nothing more than a logo and promotional activities, so this means it falls to Marketing to take care of it. The reality is that a brand is the impression various stakeholders have of a particular company/product/service as formed by the experience they have with these. This can come from an ad, call center interaction, exposure to a company's community activity or a recruiting process, or even as a supplier in trying to collect what's owed to them. Since it's on the basis therefore of interaction across the entire organization, it ultimately has to fall to the CEO to ensure the brand's protection.
Posted @ Thursday, July 23, 2009 12:28 PM by Kevin
The line between monitoring a brand's online reputation and participating in online social media is becoming increasingly blurred, and, frankly, few companies have put someone in charge of either of those areas. The CEO may be the ultimate decision-maker about whether or not to protect the company's brand, but it's not going to be monitored by him or her. A "Chief Brand Reputation Officer" should also be in charge of all the social media interactions, as part of a coordinated online/offline marketing program and should be under the company's marketing umbrella.
Posted @ Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:57 PM by Cathy Rust
Comments have been closed for this article.